Team diversity tags (single-vendor and diverse-affiliation) no longer provide useful context for our users: - As projects mature and feature development activity is more limited, a lot of projects were flapping between states depending on a couple commits or reviews, cross-project work or community goals activity. - In teams where a single individual ends up picking up the bulk of core reviewing duties, the diversity tags incentivized them to limit their activity. - Data was based on Stackalytics, which is not a highly reliable data source. Basing tags on raw data is not a great idea. Raw diversity data should be used to raise flags for further analysis (with context) rather than jumping to conclusions. - Binary tags can't reflect the complexity of that data. Single-vendor does not mean the same for PowerVMStackers and for Keystone. Trends are actually more important than value at a single point in time. - Organizational diversity is just one factor of fragility for project teams. Individual fragility (where the bulk of the work is done by one person) is actually more prevalent those days. Change-Id: I1f1e55a7605ddff572b7b674c58ab419a7fc913f
39 KiB
39 KiB