e47f695400
The django form field default is "required=True", so there remove the redundant "required=True" in doc. Change-Id: Id88e0a4d8e97e78ce8e6be760d67f0db3d69f50c
342 lines
13 KiB
ReStructuredText
342 lines
13 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _topics-datatables:
|
|
|
|
======================
|
|
DataTables Topic Guide
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Horizon provides the :mod:`horizon.tables` module to provide
|
|
a convenient, reusable API for building data-driven displays and interfaces.
|
|
The core components of this API fall into three categories: ``DataTables``,
|
|
``Actions``, and ``Class-based Views``.
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
For a detailed API information check out the :ref:`ref-datatables`.
|
|
|
|
Tables
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
The majority of interface in a dashboard-style interface ends up being
|
|
tabular displays of the various resources the dashboard interacts with.
|
|
The :class:`~horizon.tables.DataTable` class exists so you don't have to
|
|
reinvent the wheel each time.
|
|
|
|
Creating your own tables
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Creating a table is fairly simple:
|
|
|
|
#. Create a subclass of :class:`~horizon.tables.DataTable`.
|
|
#. Define columns on it using :class:`~horizon.tables.Column`.
|
|
#. Create an inner ``Meta`` class to contain the special options for
|
|
this table.
|
|
#. Define any actions for the table, and add them to
|
|
:attr:`~horizon.tables.DataTableOptions.table_actions` or
|
|
:attr:`~horizon.tables.DataTableOptions.row_actions`.
|
|
|
|
Examples of this can be found in any of the ``tables.py`` modules included
|
|
in the reference modules under ``horizon.dashboards``.
|
|
|
|
Connecting a table to a view
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Once you've got your table set up the way you like it, the next step is to
|
|
wire it up to a view. To make this as easy as possible Horizon provides the
|
|
:class:`~horizon.tables.DataTableView` class-based view which can be subclassed
|
|
to display your table with just a couple lines of code. At its simplest, it
|
|
looks like this::
|
|
|
|
from horizon import tables
|
|
from .tables import MyTable
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MyTableView(tables.DataTableView):
|
|
table_class = MyTable
|
|
template_name = "my_app/my_table_view.html"
|
|
|
|
def get_data(self):
|
|
return my_api.objects.list()
|
|
|
|
In the template you would just need to include the following to render the
|
|
table::
|
|
|
|
{{ table.render }}
|
|
|
|
That's it! Easy, right?
|
|
|
|
Actions
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
Actions comprise any manipulations that might happen on the data in the table
|
|
or the table itself. For example, this may be the standard object CRUD, linking
|
|
to related views based on the object's id, filtering the data in the table,
|
|
or fetching updated data when appropriate.
|
|
|
|
When actions get run
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
There are two points in the request-response cycle in which actions can
|
|
take place; prior to data being loaded into the table, and after the data
|
|
is loaded. When you're using one of the pre-built class-based views for
|
|
working with your tables the pseudo-workflow looks like this:
|
|
|
|
#. The request enters view.
|
|
#. The table class is instantiated without data.
|
|
#. Any "preemptive" actions are checked to see if they should run.
|
|
#. Data is fetched and loaded into the table.
|
|
#. All other actions are checked to see if they should run.
|
|
#. If none of the actions have caused an early exit from the view,
|
|
the standard response from the view is returned (usually the
|
|
rendered table).
|
|
|
|
The benefit of the multi-step table instantiation is that you can use
|
|
preemptive actions which don't need access to the entire collection of data
|
|
to save yourself on processing overhead, API calls, etc.
|
|
|
|
Basic actions
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
At their simplest, there are three types of actions: actions which act on the
|
|
data in the table, actions which link to related resources, and actions that
|
|
alter which data is displayed. These correspond to
|
|
:class:`~horizon.tables.Action`, :class:`~horizon.tables.LinkAction`, and
|
|
:class:`~horizon.tables.FilterAction`.
|
|
|
|
Writing your own actions generally starts with subclassing one of those
|
|
action classes and customizing the designated attributes and methods.
|
|
|
|
Shortcut actions
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
There are several common tasks for which Horizon provides pre-built shortcut
|
|
classes. These include :class:`~horizon.tables.BatchAction`, and
|
|
:class:`~horizon.tables.DeleteAction`. Each of these abstracts away nearly
|
|
all of the boilerplate associated with writing these types of actions and
|
|
provides consistent error handling, logging, and user-facing interaction.
|
|
|
|
It is worth noting that ``BatchAction`` and ``DeleteAction`` are extensions
|
|
of the standard ``Action`` class. Some ``BatchAction`` or ``DeleteAction``
|
|
classes may cause some unrecoverable results, like deleted images or
|
|
unrecoverable instances. It may be helpful to specify specific help_text to
|
|
explain the concern to the user, such as "Deleted images are not recoverable".
|
|
|
|
Preemptive actions
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Action classes which have their :attr:`~horizon.tables.Action.preempt`
|
|
attribute set to ``True`` will be evaluated before any data is loaded into
|
|
the table. As such, you must be careful not to rely on any table methods that
|
|
require data, such as :meth:`~horizon.tables.DataTable.get_object_display` or
|
|
:meth:`~horizon.tables.DataTable.get_object_by_id`. The advantage of preemptive
|
|
actions is that you can avoid having to do all the processing, API calls, etc.
|
|
associated with loading data into the table for actions which don't require
|
|
access to that information.
|
|
|
|
Policy checks on actions
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
The :attr:`~horizon.tables.Action.policy_rules` attribute, when set, will
|
|
validate access to the action using the policy rules specified. The attribute
|
|
is a list of scope/rule pairs. Where the scope is the service type defining
|
|
the rule and the rule is a rule from the corresponding service policy.json
|
|
file. The format of :attr:`horizon.tables.Action.policy_rules` looks like::
|
|
|
|
(("identity", "identity:get_user"),)
|
|
|
|
Multiple checks can be made for the same action by merely adding more tuples
|
|
to the list. The policy check will use information stored in the session
|
|
about the user and the result of
|
|
:meth:`~horizon.tables.Action.get_policy_target` (which can be overridden in
|
|
the derived action class) to determine if the user
|
|
can execute the action. If the user does not have access to the action, the
|
|
action is not added to the table.
|
|
|
|
If :attr:`~horizon.tables.Action.policy_rules` is not set, no policy checks
|
|
will be made to determine if the action should be visible and will be
|
|
displayed solely based on the result of
|
|
:meth:`~horizon.tables.Action.allowed`.
|
|
|
|
For more information on policy based Role Based Access Control see
|
|
:ref:`topics-policy`.
|
|
|
|
Table Cell filters (decorators)
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
DataTable displays lists of objects in rows and object attributes in cell.
|
|
How should we proceed, if we want to decorate some column, e.g. if we have
|
|
column ``memory`` which returns a number e.g. 1024, and we want to show
|
|
something like 1024.00 GB inside table?
|
|
|
|
Decorator pattern
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
The clear anti-pattern is defining the new attributes on object like
|
|
``ram_float_format_2_gb`` or to tweak a DataTable in any way for displaying
|
|
purposes.
|
|
|
|
The cleanest way is to use ``filters``. Filters are decorators, following GOF
|
|
``Decorator pattern``. This way ``DataTable logic`` and ``displayed object
|
|
logic`` are correctly separated from ``presentation logic`` of the object
|
|
inside of the various tables. And therefore the filters are reusable in all
|
|
tables.
|
|
|
|
Filter function
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
Horizon DatablesTable takes a tuple of pointers to filter functions
|
|
or anonymous lambda functions. When displaying a ``Cell``, ``DataTable``
|
|
takes ``Column`` filter functions from left to right, using the returned value
|
|
of the previous function as a parameter of the following function. Then
|
|
displaying the returned value of the last filter function.
|
|
|
|
A valid filter function takes one parameter and returns the decorated value.
|
|
So e.g. these are valid filter functions ::
|
|
|
|
# Filter function.
|
|
def add_unit(v):
|
|
return str(v) + " GB"
|
|
|
|
# Or filter lambda function.
|
|
lambda v: str(v) + " GB"
|
|
|
|
# This is also a valid definition of course, although for the change of the
|
|
# unit parameter, function has to be wrapped by lambda
|
|
# (e.g. floatformat function example below).
|
|
def add_unit(v, unit="GB"):
|
|
return str(v) + " " + unit
|
|
|
|
Using filters in DataTable column
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
DataTable takes tuple of filter functions, so e.g. this is valid decorating
|
|
of a value with float format and with unit ::
|
|
|
|
ram = tables.Column(
|
|
"ram",
|
|
verbose_name=_('Memory'),
|
|
filters=(lambda v: floatformat(v, 2),
|
|
add_unit))
|
|
|
|
It always takes tuple, so using only one filter would look like this ::
|
|
|
|
filters=(lambda v: floatformat(v, 2),)
|
|
|
|
The decorated parameter doesn't have to be only a string or number, it can
|
|
be anything e.g. list or an object. So decorating of object, that has
|
|
attributes value and unit would look like this ::
|
|
|
|
ram = tables.Column(
|
|
"ram",
|
|
verbose_name=_('Memory'),
|
|
filters=(lambda x: getattr(x, 'value', '') +
|
|
" " + getattr(x, 'unit', ''),))
|
|
|
|
Available filters
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
There are a load of filters, that can be used, defined in django already:
|
|
https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/django/template/defaultfilters.py
|
|
|
|
So it's enough to just import and use them, e.g. ::
|
|
|
|
from django.template import defaultfilters as filters
|
|
|
|
# code omitted
|
|
filters=(filters.yesno, filters.capfirst)
|
|
|
|
|
|
from django.template.defaultfilters import timesince
|
|
from django.template.defaultfilters import title
|
|
|
|
# code omitted
|
|
filters=(parse_isotime, timesince)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inline editing
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
Table cells can be easily upgraded with in-line editing. With use of
|
|
django.form.Field, we are able to run validations of the field and correctly
|
|
parse the data. The updating process is fully encapsulated into table
|
|
functionality, communication with the server goes through AJAX in JSON format.
|
|
The javascript wrapper for inline editing allows each table cell that has
|
|
in-line editing available to:
|
|
|
|
#. Refresh itself with new data from the server.
|
|
#. Display in edit mode.
|
|
#. Send changed data to server.
|
|
#. Display validation errors.
|
|
|
|
There are basically 3 things that need to be defined in the table in order
|
|
to enable in-line editing.
|
|
|
|
Fetching the row data
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Defining an ``get_data`` method in a class inherited from ``tables.Row``.
|
|
This method takes care of fetching the row data. This class has to be then
|
|
defined in the table Meta class as ``row_class = UpdateRow``.
|
|
|
|
Example::
|
|
|
|
class UpdateRow(tables.Row):
|
|
# this method is also used for automatic update of the row
|
|
ajax = True
|
|
|
|
def get_data(self, request, project_id):
|
|
# getting all data of all row cells
|
|
project_info = api.keystone.tenant_get(request, project_id,
|
|
admin=True)
|
|
return project_info
|
|
|
|
Defining a form_field for each Column that we want to be in-line edited.
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Form field should be ``django.form.Field`` instance, so we can use django
|
|
validations and parsing of the values sent by POST (in example validation
|
|
``required=True`` and correct parsing of the checkbox value from the POST
|
|
data).
|
|
|
|
Form field can be also ``django.form.Widget`` class, if we need to just
|
|
display the form widget in the table and we don't need Field functionality.
|
|
|
|
Then connecting ``UpdateRow`` and ``UpdateCell`` classes to the table.
|
|
|
|
Example::
|
|
|
|
class TenantsTable(tables.DataTable):
|
|
# Adding html text input for inline editing, with required validation.
|
|
# HTML form input will have a class attribute tenant-name-input, we
|
|
# can define here any HTML attribute we need.
|
|
name = tables.Column('name', verbose_name=_('Name'),
|
|
form_field=forms.CharField(),
|
|
form_field_attributes={'class':'tenant-name-input'},
|
|
update_action=UpdateCell)
|
|
|
|
# Adding html textarea without required validation.
|
|
description = tables.Column(lambda obj: getattr(obj, 'description', None),
|
|
verbose_name=_('Description'),
|
|
form_field=forms.CharField(
|
|
widget=forms.Textarea(),
|
|
required=False),
|
|
update_action=UpdateCell)
|
|
|
|
# Id will not be inline edited.
|
|
id = tables.Column('id', verbose_name=_('Project ID'))
|
|
|
|
# Adding html checkbox, that will be shown inside of the table cell with
|
|
# label
|
|
enabled = tables.Column('enabled', verbose_name=_('Enabled'), status=True,
|
|
form_field=forms.BooleanField(
|
|
label=_('Enabled'),
|
|
required=False),
|
|
update_action=UpdateCell)
|
|
|
|
class Meta(object):
|
|
name = "tenants"
|
|
verbose_name = _("Projects")
|
|
# Connection to UpdateRow, so table can fetch row data based on
|
|
# their primary key.
|
|
row_class = UpdateRow
|
|
|