Files
js-openstack-lib/doc/source/specs/template.rst
Michael Krotscheck 4c80eab9e7 Added Sphinx-based documentation framework and specs repo.
All of openstack's documentation infrastructure is run via sphinx, including
templates, html parsing, uploading, and more. Thus it behooves us to keep
our javascript documentation build as similar as possible. Since we want to
avoid using tox, and littering the project with pythonic artifacts, we're
instead using Sphinx' own recommended build method: A Makefile.

This patch adds a small but complete documentation tree for this project,
including the build tools needed to create it. It satisfies the need for
narrative documentation, but does not (yet) satisfy the need for code
doc generation. It also includes a section for specifications, as this
effort is not yet large enough to warrant its own specification repo.

Code documentation will need to be added in a subsequent patch, using
Sphinx' jsdoc plugins.

Change-Id: I40eab962d4e4c6eafd1b1499bb00e6af5d72ede0
2016-06-23 06:55:17 -07:00

108 lines
2.8 KiB
ReStructuredText

::
Copyright <YEARS> <HOLDER> <--UPDATE THESE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Unported License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
..
This template should be in ReSTructured text. Please do not delete
any of the sections in this template. If you have nothing to say
for a whole section, just write: "None". For help with syntax, see
http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html To test out your formatting, see
http://www.tele3.cz/jbar/rest/rest.html
===============================
The Title of Your Specification
===============================
Include the URL of your StoryBoard story:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/...
Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything?
Problem Description
===================
A detailed description of the problem.
Proposed Change
===============
Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you
propose to solve this problem?
If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In
other words, what's the scope of this effort?
Alternatives
------------
This is an optional section, where it does apply we'd just like a demonstration
that some thought has been put into why the proposed approach is the best one.
Implementation
==============
Assignee(s)
-----------
Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're
throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the
primary author and contact.
Primary assignee:
<launchpad-id or None>
Can optionally list additional ids if they intend on doing substantial
implementation work on this blueprint.
Gerrit Topic
------------
Use Gerrit topic "<topic_name>" for all patches related to this spec.
.. code-block:: bash
git-review -t <topic_name>
Work Items
----------
Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people,
but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
Documentation
-------------
Will this require a documentation change? If so, which documents?
Will it impact developer workflow? Will additional communication need
to be made?
Security
--------
Does this introduce any additional security risks, or are there
security-related considerations which should be discussed?
Testing
-------
What tests will be available or need to be constructed in order to
validate this? Unit/functional tests, development
environments/servers, etc.
Dependencies
============
- Include specific references to specs and/or stories in storyboard, or in
other projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
- Does this feature require any new library or program dependencies
not already in use?