We're in the process of overhauling the RBAC documentation in keystone The token-overview.rst doc contains some nice context about authorization scopes and it's already in the administrator guide. This commit updates the details about each scope and try to make it a little easier to read. I plan on linking to this document from the new RBAC document. Change-Id: Id2ad40947135fef73005d5f03d28882b68638579
6.2 KiB
Keystone tokens
Tokens are used to authenticate and authorize your interactions with OpenStack APIs. Tokens come in many scopes, representing various authorization and sources of identity.
Authorization scopes
Tokens are used to relay information about your role assignments. It's not uncommon for a user to have multiple role assignments, sometimes spanning projects, domains, or the entire system. These are referred to as authorization scopes, where a token has a single scope of operation (e.g., a project, domain, or the system). For example, a token scoped to a project can't be reused to do something else in a different project.
Each level of authorization scope is useful for certain types of operations in certain OpenStack services, and are not interchangeable.
Unscoped tokens
An unscoped token does not contain a service catalog, roles, or authorization scope (e.g., project, domain, or system attributes within the token). Their primary use case is simply to prove your identity to keystone at a later time (usually to generate scoped tokens), without repeatedly presenting your original credentials.
The following conditions must be met to receive an unscoped token:
- You must not specify an authorization scope in your authentication
request (for example, on the command line with arguments such as
--os-project-name
or--os-domain-id
), - Your identity must not have a "default project" associated with it that you also have role assignments, and thus authorization, upon.
Project-scoped tokens
Projects are containers for resources, like volumes or instances. Project-scoped tokens express your authorization to operate in a specific tenancy of the cloud and are useful for things like spinning up compute resources or carving off block storage. They contain a service catalog, a set of roles, and information about the project.
Most end-users need role assignments on projects to consume resources in a deployment.
Domain-scoped tokens
Domains are namespaces for projects, users, and groups. A domain-scoped token expresses your authorization to operate on the contents of a domain or the domain itself.
While some OpenStack services are still adopting the domain concept, domains are fully supported in keystone. This means users with authorization on a domain have the ability to manage things within the domain. For example, a domain administrator can create new users and projects within that domain.
Domain-scoped tokens contain a service catalog, roles, and information about the domain.
People who need to manage users and projects typically need domain-level access.
System-scoped tokens
Some OpenStack APIs fit nicely within the concept of projects (e.g., creating an instance) or domains (e.g., creating a new user), but there are also APIs that affect the entire deployment system (e.g. modifying endpoints, service management, or listing information about hypervisors). These operations are typically reserved for operators and require system-scoped tokens, which represents the role assignments a user has to operate on the deployment as a whole. The term system refers to the deployment system, which is a collection of hardware (e.g., compute nodes) and services (e.g., nova, cinder, neutron, barbican, keystone) that provide Infrastructure-as-a-Service.
System-scoped tokens contain a service catalog, roles, and information about the system. System role assignments and system-scoped tokens are typically reserved for operators and cloud administrators.
Token providers
The token type issued by keystone is configurable through the
/etc/keystone/keystone.conf
file. Currently, there are two
supported token providers, fernet
and jws
.
Fernet tokens
The fernet token format was introduced in the OpenStack Kilo release
and now is the default token provider in Keystone. Unlike the other
token types mentioned in this document, fernet tokens do not need to be
persisted in a back end. AES256
encryption is used to
protect the information stored in the token and integrity is verified
with a SHA256 HMAC
signature. Only the Identity service
should have access to the keys used to encrypt and decrypt fernet
tokens. Like UUID tokens, fernet tokens must be passed back to the
Identity service in order to validate them. For more information on the
fernet token type, see the fernet-token-faq
.
A deployment might consider using the fernet provider as opposed to JWS tokens if they are concerned about public expose of the payload used to build tokens.
JWS tokens
The JSON Web Signature (JWS) token format is a type of JSON Web Token
(JWT) and it was implemented in the Stein release. JWS tokens are
signed, meaning the information used to build the token ID is not opaque
to users and can it can be decoded by anyone. JWS tokens are ephemeral,
or non-persistent, which means they won't bloat the database or require
replication across nodes. Since the JWS token provider uses asymmetric
keys, the tokens are signed with private keys and validated with public
keys. The JWS token provider implementation only supports the
ES256
JSON Web Algorithm (JWA), which is an Elliptic Curve
Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) using the P-256 curve and a SHA-256
hash algorithm.
A deployment might consider using JWS tokens as opposed to fernet tokens if there are security concerns about sharing symmetric encryption keys across hosts. Note that a major difference between the two providers is that JWS tokens are not opaque and can be decoded by anyone with the token ID. Fernet tokens are opaque in that the token ID is ciphertext. Despite the JWS token payload being readable by anyone, keystone reserves the right to make backwards incompatible changes to the token payload itself, which is not an API contract. We only recommend validating the token against keystone's authentication API to inspect its associated metadata. We strongly discourage relying on decoded payloads for information about tokens.
More information about JWTs can be found in the specification.