Rafael Weingärtner 22a6223b1b Standardize the configuration of "oslo_messaging" section
After all of the discussions we had on
"https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2", I studied all projects that
have an "oslo_messaging" section. Afterwards, I applied the same method
that is already used in "oslo_messaging" section in Nova, Cinder, and
others. This guarantees that we have a consistent method to
enable/disable notifications across projects based on components (e.g.
Ceilometer) being enabled or disabled. Here follows the list of
components, and the respective changes I did.

* Aodh:
The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
be removed in an upcomming PR.

* Congress:
The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
be removed in an upcomming PR.

* Cinder:
It was already properly configured.

* Octavia:
The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
be removed in an upcomming PR.

* Heat:
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Ceilometer:
Ceilometer publishes some messages in the rabbitMQ. However, the
default driver is "messagingv2", and not ''(empty) as defined in Oslo;
these configurations are defined in ceilometer/publisher/messaging.py.
Therefore, we do not need to do anything for the
"oslo_messaging_notifications" section in Ceilometer

* Tacker:
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Neutron:
It was already properly configured.

* Nova
It was already properly configured. However, we found another issue
with its configuration. Kolla-ansible does not configure nova
notifications as it should. If 'searchlight' is not installed (enabled)
the 'notification_format' should be 'unversioned'. The default is
'both'; so nova will send a notification to the queue
versioned_notifications; but that queue has no consumer when
'searchlight' is disabled. In our case, the queue got 511k messages.
The huge amount of "stuck" messages made the Rabbitmq cluster
unstable.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478274
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1665449

* Nova_hyperv:
I added the same configurations as in Nova project.

* Vitrage
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Searchlight
I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
and others.

* Ironic
I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
and others.

* Glance
It was already properly configured.

* Trove
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Blazar
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Sahara
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Watcher
I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
and others.

* Barbican
I created a mechanism similar to what we have in Cinder, Nova,
and others. I also added a configuration to 'keystone_notifications'
section. Barbican needs its own queue to capture events from Keystone.
Otherwise, it has an impact on Ceilometer and other systems that are
connected to the "notifications" default queue.

* Keystone
Keystone is the system that triggered this work with the discussions
that followed on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2. After a long
discussion, we agreed to apply the same approach that we have in Nova,
Cinder and other systems in Keystone. That is what we did. Moreover, we
introduce a new topic "barbican_notifications" when barbican is
enabled. We also removed the "variable" enable_cadf_notifications, as
it is obsolete, and the default in Keystone is CADF.

* Mistral:
It was hardcoded "noop" as the driver. However, that does not seem a
good practice. Instead, I applied the same standard of using the driver
and pushing to "notifications" queue if Ceilometer is enabled.

* Cyborg:
I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova,
and others.

* Murano
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Senlin
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Manila
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Zun
The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will
be removed in an upcomming PR.

* Designate
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

* Magnum
It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit
to be the same as we have in all other components

Closes-Bug: #1838985

Change-Id: I88bdb004814f37c81c9a9c4e5e491fac69f6f202
Signed-off-by: Rafael Weingärtner <rafael@apache.org>
2019-08-15 13:18:16 -03:00
2018-07-24 14:18:20 +07:00
2019-04-19 19:29:02 +00:00
2018-07-24 14:18:20 +07:00
2018-03-26 17:56:22 +02:00
2016-11-03 16:07:47 +00:00
2014-09-20 17:29:35 -07:00
2019-05-31 10:25:28 -04:00
2017-03-02 17:44:00 +00:00
2018-12-27 04:44:49 +00:00
2019-07-05 11:44:23 -04:00

Team and repository tags

image

Kolla-Ansible Overview

The Kolla-Ansible is a deliverable project separated from Kolla project.

Kolla-Ansible deploys OpenStack services and infrastructure components in Docker containers.

Kolla's mission statement is:

To provide production-ready containers and deployment tools for operating
OpenStack clouds.

Kolla is highly opinionated out of the box, but allows for complete customization. This permits operators with little experience to deploy OpenStack quickly and as experience grows modify the OpenStack configuration to suit the operator's exact requirements.

Getting Started

Learn about Kolla-Ansible by reading the documentation online Kolla-Ansible.

Get started by reading the Developer Quickstart.

OpenStack services

Kolla-Ansible deploys containers for the following OpenStack projects:

Infrastructure components

Kolla-Ansible deploys containers for the following infrastructure components:

Directories

  • ansible - Contains Ansible playbooks to deploy OpenStack services and infrastructure components in Docker containers.
  • contrib - Contains demos scenarios for Heat, Magnum and Tacker and a development environment for Vagrant
  • doc - Contains documentation.
  • etc - Contains a reference etc directory structure which requires configuration of a small number of configuration variables to achieve a working All-in-One (AIO) deployment.
  • kolla_ansible - Contains password generation script.
  • releasenotes - Contains releasenote of all features added in Kolla-Ansible.
  • specs - Contains the Kolla-Ansible communities key arguments about architectural shifts in the code base.
  • tests - Contains functional testing tools.
  • tools - Contains tools for interacting with Kolla-Ansible.
  • zuul.d - Contains project gate job definitions.

Getting Involved

Need a feature? Find a bug? Let us know! Contributions are much appreciated and should follow the standard Gerrit workflow.

  • We communicate using the #openstack-kolla irc channel.
  • File bugs, blueprints, track releases, etc on Launchpad.
  • Attend weekly meetings.
  • Contribute code.

Contributors

Check out who's contributing code and contributing reviews.

Notices

Docker and the Docker logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Docker, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Docker, Inc. and other parties may also have trademark rights in other terms used herein.

Description
Ansible deployment of the Kolla containers
Readme 176 MiB
Languages
Jinja 48.2%
Python 39%
Shell 12.6%
Ruby 0.2%