Clarify comment about swift-object-expirer for RDO
The rational for packaging swift-object-expirer in openstack-swift-proxy is detailed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382921 It is a conscious packaging choice and not a bug, and as so update the comment in swift-object-expirer image. Change-Id: Ibccfa1482d3aeccf86a57603d9dedecbcc7d097c
This commit is contained in:
parent
731dfcb40a
commit
f0f4e70f1e
@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ LABEL maintainer="{{ maintainer }}" name="{{ image_name }}" build-date="{{ build
|
||||
|
||||
{% if install_type == 'binary' %}
|
||||
{% if base_distro in ['centos', 'oraclelinux', 'rhel'] %}
|
||||
# RDO has it packaged in the wrong package for now. The issue is being
|
||||
# tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382921
|
||||
# RDO packages swift-object-expirer in openstack-swift-proxy
|
||||
{% set swift_object_expirer_packages = ['openstack-swift-proxy'] %}
|
||||
{% elif base_distro in ['debian', 'ubuntu'] %}
|
||||
{% set swift_object_expirer_packages = ['swift-object'] %}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user