Clarify comment about swift-object-expirer for RDO

The rational for packaging swift-object-expirer in
openstack-swift-proxy is detailed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382921

It is a conscious packaging choice and not a bug, and as so update the
comment in swift-object-expirer image.

Change-Id: Ibccfa1482d3aeccf86a57603d9dedecbcc7d097c
This commit is contained in:
Martin André 2017-06-09 08:27:43 +02:00
parent 731dfcb40a
commit f0f4e70f1e

View File

@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ LABEL maintainer="{{ maintainer }}" name="{{ image_name }}" build-date="{{ build
{% if install_type == 'binary' %}
{% if base_distro in ['centos', 'oraclelinux', 'rhel'] %}
# RDO has it packaged in the wrong package for now. The issue is being
# tracked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382921
# RDO packages swift-object-expirer in openstack-swift-proxy
{% set swift_object_expirer_packages = ['openstack-swift-proxy'] %}
{% elif base_distro in ['debian', 'ubuntu'] %}
{% set swift_object_expirer_packages = ['swift-object'] %}