masakari-specs/doc/source/specs/template.rst
dineshbhor c6c09dbe3c Add Rocky specs repo
This patch adds rocky specs repo.

In addition to that it also fixes below issues:
1. Adds a single template.rst for all branches in
   doc/source/specs repo.
2. Fixes incorrect references in history section.
3. Creates missing symbolic links to specs templates.
4. Moves implemented specs from 'approved' to 'implemented'
   directory.
   In future we should have a tox script similar to [1] for
   moving implemented specs from approved to implemented directory.

[1] dad9782fc1/tox.ini (L32)

Change-Id: I4499facd28b1cc48d425a8fe15930ebaa4ac24d9
2018-04-17 18:33:34 -07:00

87 lines
2.5 KiB
ReStructuredText

..
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
..
This template should be in ReSTructured text. The filename in the git
repository should match the launchpad URL, for example a URL of
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/masakari/+spec/awesome-thing should be named
awesome-thing.rst . Please do not delete any of the sections in this
template. If you have nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None
For help with syntax, see http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html
To test out your formatting, see http://www.tele3.cz/jbar/rest/rest.html
===========================
The title of your blueprint
===========================
Include the URL of your launchpad blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/masakari/+spec/example
Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything?
Problem description
===================
A detailed description of the problem.
Proposed change
===============
Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you
propose to solve this problem?
If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In
other words, what's the scope of this effort?
Include where in the masakari tree hierarchy this will reside.
Alternatives
------------
This is an optional section, where it does apply we'd just like a demonstration
that some thought has been put into why the proposed approach is the best one.
Implementation
==============
Assignee(s)
-----------
Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're
throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the
primary author and contact.
Primary assignee:
<launchpad-id or None>
Can optionally can list additional ids if they intend on doing
substantial implementation work on this blueprint.
Milestones
----------
Target Milestone for completion:
Juno-1
Work Items
----------
Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people,
but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
Dependencies
============
- Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in masakari, or in other
projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
- Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not
included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library?