Update patch set 1
Patch Set 1: (2 comments) Patch-set: 1 Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 13252 \u003c13252@4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_13252\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
63c59e8bfa
commit
53051f1c99
|
@ -133,6 +133,30 @@
|
|||
"revId": "33f1231954f739b6105ce35bca96cde10111af0c",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "4ceb4bb4_dd33064e",
|
||||
"filename": "specs/2024.1/l3bgp-peer-connect-mode.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 46,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13252
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2023-11-20T07:04:00Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "This feature has been requested earlier and I think it is a valid topic, although it can be difficult to solve, in particular when there are additional networking layers involved, like the agent running in a container.\n\nThis is also somewhat related to a different common feature request asking for a possibility to query the status of a BGP session, both to verify operation and to aid in debugging.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "779ad168_61306e7b",
|
||||
"range": {
|
||||
"startLine": 45,
|
||||
"startChar": 5,
|
||||
"endLine": 46,
|
||||
"endChar": 15
|
||||
},
|
||||
"revId": "33f1231954f739b6105ce35bca96cde10111af0c",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
|
@ -232,6 +256,24 @@
|
|||
"revId": "33f1231954f739b6105ce35bca96cde10111af0c",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "721d9140_e8cef325",
|
||||
"filename": "specs/2024.1/l3bgp-peer-connect-mode.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 1
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 63,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 13252
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2023-11-20T07:04:00Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I think this is still a valid point, it may make sense to set this option per BGP speaker or even per peer?\n\nIf you argue that operator interaction is needed anyway, then you could say that all of the n-d-r API is not needed and should be replaced by static configuration.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "77998aa4_a837ca6f",
|
||||
"revId": "33f1231954f739b6105ce35bca96cde10111af0c",
|
||||
"serverId": "4a232e18-c5a9-48ee-94c0-e04e7cca6543"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue