Brian Haley 4350ed3c35 Better handle ports in security groups ... After taking a closer look at bug 1818385, I found a couple of follow-on things to fix in the security group code. First, there are very few protocols that accept ports, especially via iptables. For this reason I think it's acceptable that the API rejects them as invalid. Second, UDPlite has some interesting support in iptables. It does not support using --dport directly, but does using '-m multiport --dports 123', and also supports port ranges using '-m multiport --dports 123:124'. Added code for this special case. Change-Id: Ifb2e6bb6c7a2e2987ba95040ef5a98ed50aa36d4 Closes-Bug: #1818385		2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00
..
common	Merge "Fix pep8 E128 warnings in non-test code"	2019-03-15 11:37:27 +00:00
contrib	Merge "Migrate neutron-functional job to zuul v3 syntax"	2019-03-13 23:25:03 +00:00
etc	Convert policy.json into policy-in-code	2018-12-13 20:37:53 +00:00
fullstack	Remove deprecated 'external_network_bridge' option	2019-03-09 22:07:38 +00:00
functional	Merge "Fix pep8 E128 warnings in non-test code"	2019-03-15 11:37:27 +00:00
unit	Better handle ports in security groups	2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00
var	…
__init__.py	Avoid eventlet monkey patching for the tempest plugin	2016-04-29 22:47:24 -05:00
base.py	Add new test decorator skip_if_timeout	2019-02-14 11:08:19 +01:00
post_mortem_debug.py	…
tools.py	consume is_bsd from neutron-lib	2019-03-11 09:50:03 -06:00