Brian Haley 4350ed3c35 Better handle ports in security groups
After taking a closer look at bug 1818385, I found a couple
of follow-on things to fix in the security group code.

First, there are very few protocols that accept ports,
especially via iptables.  For this reason I think it's
acceptable that the API rejects them as invalid.

Second, UDPlite has some interesting support in iptables.  It
does not support using --dport directly, but does using
'-m multiport --dports 123', and also supports port ranges using
'-m multiport --dports 123:124'.  Added code for this special
case.

Change-Id: Ifb2e6bb6c7a2e2987ba95040ef5a98ed50aa36d4
Closes-Bug: #1818385
2019-03-15 13:54:33 -04:00
2016-06-28 22:46:19 +02:00
2016-10-17 17:06:19 +05:30
2014-05-16 13:40:04 -04:00
2017-06-13 19:26:49 +00:00
2017-08-31 16:44:51 +02:00
2017-03-04 11:19:58 +00:00

Team and repository tags

image

Welcome!

To learn more about neutron:

Get in touch via email. Use [Neutron] in your subject.

To learn how to contribute:

CONTRIBUTING.rst

Description
OpenStack Networking (Neutron)
Readme 1 GiB
Languages
Python 99.7%
Shell 0.3%