At the summit we agreed the priorities for the liberty release. This records the outcome of that discussion, and allows those unable to be at the summit to be involved in that discussion. In addition, I have added some information about the most important things that were discussed, but don't yet have a firm enough plan to go on the list of priorities. The raw discussion notes can be found here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-nova-liberty-priorities Change-Id: I806b35a29f70a09fd06692adff6d0af9ef486fe3
4.3 KiB
Liberty Project Priorities
List of priorities (in the form of use cases) the nova development team is prioritizing in Liberty (in no particular order).
Priority | Owner |
---|---|
Cells V2 | Andrew Laski |
V2.1 API | Ken'ichi Ohmichi, Sean Dague |
Scheduler | Jay Pipes |
Upgrades | Dan Smith |
DevRef Update | John Garbutt |
Priorities without a clear plan
Here are some things we would like to be a priority, but we are currently lacking either a clear plan or someone to lead that effort:
- A plan for the future of flavors, image properties and host aggregates
- Tasks for API triggered operations
- Simplify Quotas
- Revisit how we talk to Glance, Neutron and Cinder APIs
- Neutron/Nova-network integration (Fast Path, VIF plug)
- Feature Test Classification
- Fixing more bugs
John Garbutt will work with the Nova community to get backlog specs defined for all of the above. Firstly, it will make clear the scope of each bullet. Secondly, we hope it will then be easier to then find help addressing these items.
Should we find people to work on these items, it is possible we might promote them to an official priority later in the release, should there appear to be room in the review pipeline.
Cells v2
We started the cells v2 effort in Kilo. During Liberty are are focusing on making the default setup a single cells v2 deployment.
In the M release, we hope to have support for multiple cells in a cells v2 deployment, including a way to migrate existing cells v1 deployments to cells v2.
V2.1 API
Complete the work around API microversions, with a particular focus on documentation, tempest coverage and python-novaclient support. We also need to define the policy around when to bump the API microversion and what changes are allowed in a microversion bump.
We are explicitly excluding work on porting any cosmetic changes from the previous v3 API efforts into new API microversions.
Scheduler
During Kilo we made much progress on cleaning up the interface between the scheduler and the rest of Nova.
In Liberty we hope to complete the work around request spec and resource objects. We also want to start looking at the service group API, and more work on the resource tracker.
Upgrades
While we have made great strides with our upgrades in the last few releases, there are several items related to database migrations that need completing.
Firstly, we need to fully document our new online data migration approach that we tested out during kilo to perform the flavor migration from system metadata to instance extra. In addition, we should tidy up the documentation around how we bump RPC and object versions across release boundaries to remove technical debt.
Secondly, we must complete the first step towards us having online schema migrations, by splitting the schema migrations into an expand and contract phase.
Thirdly, we must complete the final parts of converting all code to access the database via DB objects.
DevRef Update
A key part of being able to scale out the Nova team is doing a better job of sharing information on how the Nova community operates, how the Nova architecture works, the basic design tenets we are using, the scope of Nova, and so on.
The main goal is to make it easier to on-board new Nova contributors and make it easier to discover any decisions that have been already made by the community.