Document experimental pipeline in Nova CI
Add a section in "core-review" to document how experimental pipeline would be used by Nova developers in order to consume the resources at the right time. Change-Id: I5df377032c2fcec18cdf71af2568e028373bcced
This commit is contained in:
parent
ddbbf57827
commit
26826bc686
@ -195,6 +195,24 @@ Please note:
|
|||||||
* We are only talking about the testing of in-tree code. Please note the only
|
* We are only talking about the testing of in-tree code. Please note the only
|
||||||
public API is our REST API, see: :doc:`policies`
|
public API is our REST API, see: :doc:`policies`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Should I run the experimental queue jobs on this change?
|
||||||
|
========================================================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Because we can't run all CI jobs in the check and gate pipelines, some
|
||||||
|
jobs can be executed on demand, thanks to the experimental pipeline.
|
||||||
|
To run the experimental jobs, you need to comment your Gerrit review
|
||||||
|
with "check experimental".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The experimental jobs aim to test specific features, such as LXC containers
|
||||||
|
or DVR with multiple nodes. Also, it might be useful to run them when
|
||||||
|
we want to test backward compatibility with tools that deploy OpenStack
|
||||||
|
outside Devstack (e.g. TripleO, etc). They can produce a non-voting
|
||||||
|
feedback of whether the system continues to work when we deprecate
|
||||||
|
or remove some options or features in Nova.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The experimental queue can also be used to test that new CI jobs are
|
||||||
|
correct before making them voting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Database Schema
|
Database Schema
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user