nova/doc/source/contributor/releasenotes.rst
Stephen Finucane a2165cf651 doc: Populate the 'contributor' section
Per the spec [1]:

  contributor/ – anything related to contributing to the project or how
  the team is managed. Applies to some of the current content under
  /developer, we are changing the name to emphasize that not all
  contributors are developers and sometimes developers are users but not
  contributors.

We currently have a handful of docs that focus on the "how to develop or
contribute" aspects of nova, and these are moved. Docs that focus on
architecture or design decisions for nova are not moved, as these will
go into 'reference'.

A TODO is added to the former 'api_plugins' document as it's mega
out-of-date and needs some serious work.

[1] specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration

Change-Id: Iad770688b4eafeb9caa710b4398b02d80a017a70
2017-07-18 15:41:19 +01:00

66 lines
2.7 KiB
ReStructuredText

.. _releasenotes:
Release Notes
=============
What is reno ?
--------------
Nova uses `reno <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/usage.html>`_ for
providing release notes in-tree. That means that a patch can include a *reno
file* or a series can have a follow-on change containing that file explaining
what the impact is.
A *reno file* is a YAML file written in the releasenotes/notes tree which is
generated using the reno tool this way:
.. code-block:: bash
$ tox -e venv -- reno new <name-your-file>
where usually ``<name-your-file>`` can be ``bp-<blueprint_name>`` for a
blueprint or ``bug-XXXXXX`` for a bugfix.
Refer to the `reno documentation <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/usage.html#editing-a-release-note>`_
for the full list of sections.
When a release note is needed
-----------------------------
A release note is required anytime a reno section is needed. Below are some
examples for each section. Any sections that would be blank should be left out
of the note file entirely. If no section is needed, then you know you don't
need to provide a release note :-)
* ``upgrade``
* The patch has an `UpgradeImpact <http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review>`_ tag
* A DB change needs some deployer modification (like a migration)
* A configuration option change (deprecation, removal or modified default)
* some specific changes that have a `DocImpact <http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review>`_ tag
but require further action from an deployer perspective
* any patch that requires an action from the deployer in general
* ``security``
* If the patch fixes a known vulnerability
* ``features``
* If the patch has an `APIImpact <http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review>`_ tag
* For nova-manage and python-novaclient changes, if it adds or changes a
new command, including adding new options to existing commands
* not all blueprints in general, just the ones impacting a `contractual API <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/policies.html#public-contractual-apis>`_
* a new virt driver is provided or an existing driver impacts the `HypervisorSupportMatrix <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html>`_
* ``critical``
* Bugfixes categorized as Critical in Launchpad *impacting users*
* ``fixes``
* No clear definition of such bugfixes. Hairy long-standing bugs with high
importance that have been fixed are good candidates though.
Three sections are left intentionally unexplained (``prelude``, ``issues`` and
``other``). Those are targeted to be filled in close to the release time for
providing details about the soon-ish release. Don't use them unless you know
exactly what you are doing.