openstack/openstack-manuals
Code Issues Proposed changes

Fix the recommendation about file system of Ceph

Browse Source 
The current document mentions that ceph developers recommend btrfs as a
fs for storage, however this is not the case as btrfs is not yet stable
for production clusters and only recommended in not critical
environments.

Change-Id: Ic8a977c6392e49c8516c27ea20374abc02abcb31
Closes-bug: #1491767
This commit is contained in:
Shuquan Huang 2015-09-16 22:19:56 +08:00
parent e03cb92302
commit 0716f28e13
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
doc/config-reference/block-storage/drivers/ceph-rbd-volume-driver.xml
View File

@ -55,10 +55,10 @@
servers.</para> servers.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</itemizedlist> </itemizedlist>
<para>Ceph developers recommend that you use <systemitem>Btrfs</systemitem> as a file system <para>Ceph developers recommend XFS for production deployments, <systemitem>Btrfs</systemitem>
for storage. XFS might be a better alternative for production environments;XFS for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. Btrfs has the correct
is an excellent alternative to Btrfs. The ext4 file system is also compatible but does feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4 provide the
not exploit the power of Ceph.</para> necessary stability for today’s deployments.</para>
<note> <note>
<para>If using <systemitem>Btrfs</systemitem>, ensure that you use the correct version <para>If using <systemitem>Btrfs</systemitem>, ensure that you use the correct version
(see <link xlink:href="http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/os-recommendations/.">Ceph (see <link xlink:href="http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/os-recommendations/.">Ceph