9dead00ded
- Moved RST guide to the arch-design folder - Deleted XML files - Updated scripts Change-Id: Id0e38a9cada9dd75cb9c8f3bd2d88ce2f4fd3eac Implements: blueprint archguide-mitaka-rst
156 lines
6.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
156 lines
6.3 KiB
ReStructuredText
========================
|
|
Technical considerations
|
|
========================
|
|
|
|
A hybrid cloud environment requires inspection and
|
|
understanding of technical issues in external data centers that may
|
|
not be in your control. Ideally, select an architecture
|
|
and CMP that are adaptable to changing environments.
|
|
|
|
Using diverse cloud platforms increases the risk of compatibility
|
|
issues, but clouds using the same version and distribution
|
|
of OpenStack are less likely to experience problems.
|
|
|
|
Clouds that exclusively use the same versions of OpenStack should
|
|
have no issues, regardless of distribution. More recent distributions
|
|
are less likely to encounter incompatibility between versions.
|
|
An OpenStack community initiative defines core functions that need to
|
|
remain backward compatible between supported versions. For example, the
|
|
DefCore initiative defines basic functions that every distribution must
|
|
support in order to use the name OpenStack.
|
|
|
|
Vendors can add proprietary customization to their distributions.
|
|
If an application or architecture makes use of these features, it can be
|
|
difficult to migrate to or use other types of environments.
|
|
|
|
If an environment includes non-OpenStack clouds, it may experience
|
|
compatibility problems. CMP tools must account for the differences in
|
|
the handling of operations and the implementation of services.
|
|
|
|
**Possible cloud incompatibilities**
|
|
|
|
* Instance deployment
|
|
* Network management
|
|
* Application management
|
|
* Services implementation
|
|
|
|
Capacity planning
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
One of the primary reasons many organizations use a hybrid cloud
|
|
is to increase capacity without making large capital investments.
|
|
|
|
Capacity and the placement of workloads are key design considerations
|
|
for hybrid clouds. The long-term capacity plan for these designs must
|
|
incorporate growth over time to prevent permanent consumption of more
|
|
expensive external clouds.
|
|
To avoid this scenario, account for future applications' capacity
|
|
requirements and plan growth appropriately.
|
|
|
|
It is difficult to predict the amount of load a particular
|
|
application might incur if the number of users fluctuates, or the
|
|
application experiences an unexpected increase in use.
|
|
It is possible to define application requirements in terms of
|
|
vCPU, RAM, bandwidth, or other resources and plan appropriately.
|
|
However, other clouds might not use the same meter or even the same
|
|
oversubscription rates.
|
|
|
|
Oversubscription is a method to emulate more capacity than
|
|
may physically be present.
|
|
For example, a physical hypervisor node with 32 GB RAM may host
|
|
24 instances, each provisioned with 2 GB RAM.
|
|
As long as all 24 instances do not concurrently use 2 full
|
|
gigabytes, this arrangement works well.
|
|
However, some hosts take oversubscription to extremes and,
|
|
as a result, performance can be inconsistent.
|
|
If at all possible, determine what the oversubscription rates
|
|
of each host are and plan capacity accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Utilization
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
A CMP must be aware of what workloads are running, where they are
|
|
running, and their preferred utilizations.
|
|
For example, in most cases it is desirable to run as many workloads
|
|
internally as possible, utilizing other resources only when necessary.
|
|
On the other hand, situations exist in which the opposite is true,
|
|
such as when an internal cloud is only for development and stressing
|
|
it is undesirable. A cost model of various scenarios and
|
|
consideration of internal priorities helps with this decision.
|
|
To improve efficiency, automate these decisions when possible.
|
|
|
|
The Telemetry service (ceilometer) provides information on the usage
|
|
of various OpenStack components. Note the following:
|
|
|
|
* If Telemetry must retain a large amount of data, for
|
|
example when monitoring a large or active cloud, we recommend
|
|
using a NoSQL back end such as MongoDB.
|
|
* You must monitor connections to non-OpenStack clouds
|
|
and report this information to the CMP.
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Performance is critical to hybrid cloud deployments, and they are
|
|
affected by many of the same issues as multi-site deployments, such
|
|
as network latency between sites. Also consider the time required to
|
|
run a workload in different clouds and methods for reducing this time.
|
|
This may require moving data closer to applications or applications
|
|
closer to the data they process, and grouping functionality so that
|
|
connections that require low latency take place over a single cloud
|
|
rather than spanning clouds.
|
|
This may also require a CMP that can determine which cloud can most
|
|
efficiently run which types of workloads.
|
|
|
|
As with utilization, native OpenStack tools help improve performance.
|
|
For example, you can use Telemetry to measure performance and the
|
|
Orchestration service (heat) to react to changes in demand.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Orchestration requires special client configurations to integrate
|
|
with Amazon Web Services. For other types of clouds, use CMP features.
|
|
|
|
Components
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Using more than one cloud in any design requires consideration of
|
|
four OpenStack tools:
|
|
|
|
OpenStack Compute (nova)
|
|
Regardless of deployment location, hypervisor choice has a direct
|
|
effect on how difficult it is to integrate with additional clouds.
|
|
|
|
Networking (neutron)
|
|
Whether using OpenStack Networking (neutron) or legacy
|
|
networking (nova-network), it is necessary to understand
|
|
network integration capabilities in order to connect between clouds.
|
|
|
|
Telemetry (ceilometer)
|
|
Use of Telemetry depends, in large part, on what the other parts
|
|
of the cloud you are using.
|
|
|
|
Orchestration (heat)
|
|
Orchestration can be a valuable tool in orchestrating tasks a
|
|
CMP decides are necessary in an OpenStack-based cloud.
|
|
|
|
Special considerations
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Hybrid cloud deployments require consideration of two issues that
|
|
are not common in other situations:
|
|
|
|
Image portability
|
|
As of the Kilo release, there is no common image format that is
|
|
usable by all clouds. Conversion or recreation of images is necessary
|
|
if migrating between clouds. To simplify deployment, use the smallest
|
|
and simplest images feasible, install only what is necessary, and
|
|
use a deployment manager such as Chef or Puppet. Do not use golden
|
|
images to speed up the process unless you repeatedly deploy the same
|
|
images on the same cloud.
|
|
|
|
API differences
|
|
Avoid using a hybrid cloud deployment with more than just
|
|
OpenStack (or with different versions of OpenStack) as API changes
|
|
can cause compatibility issues.
|