A recent keystone change [1] resulted in the domain_id field
being included when showing a role.
[1] 407eabde41
Change-Id: I344f4d727f2a16217c075ad8b8393c1e0a233c2e
Closes-Bug: #1544547
As Richard <rtheis@us.ibm.com> has pointed out, "abstractmethod"
should be "abstract method". This is a small typo I have made
when I fix DisplayCommandBase comment bug.
Change-Id: I84f1a3158896257686a0a7efa1123eef1b85139f
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns
and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of
columns and a tuple of data.
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and
a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 3 in all but identity tests. There are too many
such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch.
Change-Id: I1afe4852069d25d562a9448ec2bf2cff58955052
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns
and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of
columns and a tuple of data.
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and
a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 2 in all but identity tests. There are too many
such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch.
Change-Id: I00f38d12f55abe20fa708f6349073da658622f8d
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns
and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of
columns and a tuple of data.
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and
a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting
from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 1 in all but identity tests. There are too many
such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch.
Change-Id: I9849baa8141ea8af2042a69afd540b77ce6ae6bd
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of
columns and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple
of columns and a tuple of data
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action()
returns a tuple and a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action()
returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 3 in compute tests.
Change-Id: I4df224ec82b5d82a3d6d3f366c0f68a7ea0d87cd
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of
columns and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple
of columns and a tuple of data
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action()
returns a tuple and a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action()
returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 2 in compute tests.
Change-Id: Idc54ad21eaa1371ebd601327b8d962c7039f2de0
Partial-bug: #1477199
As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the
unit test code of OSC.
# DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples
There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff.
All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff,
class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this:
Object
|--> Command
|--> DisplayCommandBase
|--> Lister
|--> ShowOne
take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is
overwritten by subclasses.
* Command.take_action() returns nothing.
* Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of
columns and a generator used to generate the data.
* ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple
of columns and a tuple of data
So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps:
1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing.
2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action()
returns a tuple and a generator.
3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes
inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action()
returns two tuples.
This patch finishes step 1 in compute tests.
Change-Id: I99ab42a7de69af0e5de802a1bb5aac647245a200
Partial-bug: #1477199
projects mock has been defined in FakeIdentityv2Client as
tenants, and in FakeIdentityv3Client as projects. No need
to define them again.
Change-Id: Ieb97b32d7be6bd95c8621092b218ebfd8bc5b78d
This is a test to see if we can update release notes from previous releases.
This may not work and will be abandoned if so.
Change-Id: Id85a25c793aa403025c7e32038ea7072139700db
The triggering crash dump feature is supported by nova [1] and
novaclient [2] now, it's time to introduce this feature into
OSC correspondingly.
[1]The change id is: I6ed777ff637254b4b79417008f9055dd19fc7405
[2]The change id is: If03b1864bbe7074c720b946fc2700bd5d07debc3
Change-Id: I5a411f283fdf0fc3c00380d069848a332c799cdd
Closes-Bug: #1538372
Co-Authored-By: Tang Chen <chen.tang@easystack.cn>
There is no unit tests for "hypervisor" command. This patch
introudces a new class FakeHypervisor to fake one or more
hypervisors, and a base class TestHypervisor. Also adds
hypervisors mock to fake compute client.
And also, this patch adds unit tests for "hypervisor list"
command.
Change-Id: I18733eae1a8f4fff72e830d9a060fb8f0f58fbf5
In https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273653/ Bryan Jones made
a point about using mock_sleep.assert_not_called() rather than
self.assertFalse(mock_sleep.called), so let's make that change
throughout these tests.
Change-Id: I826d608836955383891b303355edcca7b62faa16
