Monty Taylor bfeffb6366 Use testr instead of nose.
nose is invasive and can sometimes alter the outcome of a test run. testr,
on the other hand, keeps a distinction between running tests and displaying
results of the test runs. Additionally, it supports the stock python unittest
protocol.

Even better, testr supports parallel test running, which makes things faster,
and a command "testr run --failing" which will just re-run the latest failing
tests (often something one wants to do in iterative dev)

Part of blueprint grizzly-testtools

Change-Id: I0b3f1bcb5d4ff59c65eb3219b30a9e64f54d70bd
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2012-12-20 14:03:19 -06:00
2012-08-29 13:43:15 +08:00
2012-12-20 14:03:19 -06:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2012-05-08 16:30:13 +01:00
2012-06-26 21:23:25 -05:00
2012-05-08 15:21:56 +01:00
2012-05-21 12:52:55 +02:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00
2013-01-18 16:13:27 -05:00

Python bindings to the OpenStack Object Storage API

This is a python client for the Swift API. There's a Python API (the swiftclient module), and a command-line script (swift).

Development takes place via the usual OpenStack processes as outlined in the OpenStack wiki. The master repository is on GitHub.

This code is based on original the client previously included with OpenStack's swift The python-swiftclient is licensed under the Apache License like the rest of OpenStack.

Contents:

Description
OpenStack Storage (Swift) Client
Readme 14 MiB
Languages
Python 99.9%
Shell 0.1%