2b3b1792d5
In Python 3 __ne__ by default delegates to __eq__ and inverts the result, but in Python 2 they urge you to define __ne__ when you define __eq__ for it to work properly [1]. There are no implied relationships among the comparison operators. The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false. Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected. [1]https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__ne__ Change-Id: I6adceadb6e3749e34cf847654f28a3b6eea832fd
This is the client API library for Tacker.