move release model into deliverable files

Because release models change from series to series, we want to track
the data in the releases repository instead of in the governance
repository. This change adds a new 'release-model' field to the
deliverable files to hold the new value.

The valid release models are documented as part of a new reference
section for the published documentation for the site.

The validator looks only at the deliverable file for the release model,
and no longer looks at the projects.yaml file in the governance
repository. For files in the _independent directory, the release model
is inferred from the filename to avoid having to set it redundantly.

Change-Id: I81198a86da98436dc2f65806aafc5f241340c57f
Signed-off-by: Doug Hellmann <doug@doughellmann.com>
This commit is contained in:
Doug Hellmann 2016-11-09 15:58:36 -05:00
parent 11e993df69
commit 2f24a51f6b
5 changed files with 139 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ deliverable. For each release, we need to track:
* the launchpad project name (such as ``oslo.config``)
* the email list to receive release announcements
* the series (Kilo, Liberty, etc.)
* the release model being used
* for each repository
* the name (such as ``openstack/oslo.config``)
@ -210,6 +211,11 @@ The top level of a deliverable file is a mapping with keys:
announcement should include the link to the package on
PyPI. Defaults to ``no``.
``release-model``
Identify the release model used by the deliverable. See
the reference section of the documentation for descriptions
of the valid models.
``artifact-link-mode``
Describe how to link to artifacts produced by the project. The
default is ``tarball`. Valid values are:

View File

@ -130,3 +130,12 @@ Deliverables organized by the team that produces them.
:glob:
teams/*
References
==========
.. toctree::
:maxdepth: 2
:glob:
reference/*

View File

@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
================
Release Models
================
Development in OpenStack is organized around 6-month cycles (like
"kilo"). At the end of every 6-month cycle a number of projects
release at the same time, providing a convenient reference point for
downstream teams (stable branch maintenance, vulnerability management)
and downstream users (in particular packagers of OpenStack
distributions).
This "final" release may be the only release of the development cycle,
in which case the project publishes intermediary "development
milestones" on a time-based schedule during the cycle. Or the project
may release more often and make intermediary releases in the middle of
the cycle. Other projects trail the main release deadline, waiting for
the final releases of components on which they rely.
A given deliverable can't have more than one model. It therefore must
choose between one of the following models.
.. _model-cycle-with-milestones:
cycle-with-milestones
=====================
The "cycle-with-milestones" model describes projects thatproduce a
single release at the end of the cycle, with development milestones
published at predetermined times in the cycle schedule.
* "cycle-with-milestones" projects commit to publish development
milestones following a predetermined schedule published by the Release
Management team before the start of the 6-month cycle.
* "cycle-with-milestones" projects commit to produce a release to
match the end of the 6-month development cycle.
* Release tags for deliverables using this tag are reviewed and
applied by the Release Management team.
.. _model-cycle-with-intermediary:
cycle-with-intermediary
=======================
The "cycle-with-intermediary" model describes projects that produce
multiple full releases during the development cycle, with a final
release to match the end of the cycle.
* "cycle-with-intermediary" projects commit to produce a
release near the end of the 6-month development cycle to be used
with projects using the other cycle-based release models that are
required to produce a release at that time.
* Release tags for deliverables using this tag are reviewed and
applied by the Release Management team.
.. _model-cycle-trailing:
cycle-trailing
==============
The "cycle-trailing" model describes projects that follow the release
cycle, but because they rely on the other projects being completed may
not always publish their final release at the same time as those
projects. For example, projects related to packaging or deploying
OpenStack components need the final releases of those components to be
available before they can run their own final tests.
.. warning::
This release model is not intended for use by components that have
programmatic dependencies on each other, such as one service that
calls another or a library used by multiple services. It is
intended for use by projects that truly cannot complete their work
without "final" versions of their dependencies.
* "cycle-trailing" projects commit to produce a release no later than
2 weeks after the end of the 6-month development cycle.
* Within the cycle, projects using this release model will produce
intermediate or milestone releases (adhering to the same regular
deadlines) leading up to their final release.
* Release tags for deliverables using this tag are reviewed and
applied by the Release Management team.
.. _model-independent:
independent
===========
Some projects opt to completely bypass the 6-month cycle and release
independently. For example, that is the case of projects that support
the development infrastructure. The "independent" model describes such
projects.
* "independent" projects produce releases from time to time.
* Release tags for deliverables using this tag are managed without
oversight from the Release Management team.

View File

@ -41,6 +41,13 @@ from openstack_releases import versionutils
urllib3.disable_warnings()
_VALID_MODELS = set([
'cycle-with-milestones',
'cycle-with-intermediary',
'cycle-trailing',
'independent',
])
def is_a_hash(val):
"Return bool indicating if val looks like a valid hash."
@ -73,14 +80,6 @@ def main():
zuul_layout = project_config.get_zuul_layout_data()
team_data = governance.get_team_data()
independent_repos = set(
r.name
for r in governance.get_repositories(
team_data,
tags=['release:independent'],
)
)
independent_checks = set()
errors = []
warnings = []
@ -170,6 +169,21 @@ def main():
os.path.dirname(filename)
)
# Determine the release model. Don't require independent
# projects to redundantly specify that they are independent by
# including the value in their deliverablefile, but everyone
# else must provide a valid value.
is_independent = (series_name == '_independent')
if is_independent:
release_model = 'independent'
else:
release_model = deliverable_info.get('release-model', 'UNSPECIFIED')
if release_model not in _VALID_MODELS:
errors.append(
'Unknown release model %r for %s, must be one of %r' %
(release_model, filename, sorted(list(_VALID_MODELS)))
)
# Remember which entries are new so we can verify that they
# appear at the end of the file.
new_releases = {}
@ -180,11 +194,6 @@ def main():
for release in deliverable_info['releases']:
for project in release['projects']:
is_independent = (
(series_name, project['repo']) in independent_checks or
project['repo'] in independent_repos or
series_name == '_independent'
)
# Check for release jobs (if we ship a tarball)
if link_mode != 'none':
@ -208,7 +217,6 @@ def main():
filename)
print(msg)
warnings.append(msg)
independent_checks.add((series_name, project['repo']))
# Check the SHA specified for the tag.
print('%s SHA %s ' % (project['repo'],

View File

@ -86,6 +86,13 @@ class Deliverable(object):
return t.partition(':')[-1]
return 'unknown'
@property
def model(self):
for t in self.tags:
if t.startswith('release:'):
return t.partition(':')[-1]
return 'none'
@property
def tags(self):
return set(self.data.get('tags', [])).union(self.team.tags)