[octavia] create pike-em tag against final releases
This is a procedural review to transition pike into extended maintenance by creating the pike-em tag It's possible that the release isn't needed (for example if there are no code changes sine the previous release, sadly that's non-trivial to detect en masse. If you are the PTL or release liaison for this team please +1 this review if it is ready or -1 and take over the review to correct mistakes. Change-Id: Ifc2212664deb968906423fe7d289a109e4375afa
This commit is contained in:
parent
c2b3044800
commit
375a238744
@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ releases:
|
||||
- hash: cea4e2c5904e3b2e32070afcec37db1f36668a67
|
||||
repo: openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard
|
||||
version: 3.0.3
|
||||
- projects:
|
||||
- hash: cea4e2c5904e3b2e32070afcec37db1f36668a67
|
||||
repo: openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard
|
||||
version: pike-em
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- location: 3.0.0.0rc1
|
||||
name: stable/pike
|
||||
|
@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ releases:
|
||||
- hash: ecd495b7bfabcfe30f0b17a2510ac91b1d60b7b7
|
||||
repo: openstack/neutron-lbaas
|
||||
version: 11.0.4
|
||||
- projects:
|
||||
- hash: ecd495b7bfabcfe30f0b17a2510ac91b1d60b7b7
|
||||
repo: openstack/neutron-lbaas
|
||||
version: pike-em
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- location: 11.0.0.0rc1
|
||||
name: stable/pike
|
||||
|
@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ releases:
|
||||
- hash: d8707f9a74636995edb3eb9a5db3ce4adc265af9
|
||||
repo: openstack/octavia
|
||||
version: 1.0.5
|
||||
- projects:
|
||||
- hash: d8707f9a74636995edb3eb9a5db3ce4adc265af9
|
||||
repo: openstack/octavia
|
||||
version: pike-em
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- location: 1.0.0.0rc1
|
||||
name: stable/pike
|
||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ releases:
|
||||
- hash: 2b532d92be3dd0631283ebc6f3b7b401d0c557ca
|
||||
repo: openstack/python-octaviaclient
|
||||
version: 1.2.1
|
||||
- projects:
|
||||
- hash: 2b532d92be3dd0631283ebc6f3b7b401d0c557ca
|
||||
repo: openstack/python-octaviaclient
|
||||
version: pike-em
|
||||
branches:
|
||||
- name: stable/pike
|
||||
location: 1.1.0
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user