d48036ba3e
Setuptools v54.1.0 introduces a warning that the use of dash-separated options in 'setup.cfg' will not be supported in a future version [1]. Get ahead of the issue by replacing the dashes with underscores. Without this, we see 'UserWarning' messages like the following on new enough versions of setuptools: UserWarning: Usage of dash-separated 'description-file' will not be supported in future versions. Please use the underscore name 'description_file' instead [1] https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/commit/a2e9ae4cb Change-Id: Icd54fc860f354787bfd16da7d47e705523305094 |
||
---|---|---|
doc/source | ||
specs | ||
tests | ||
.gitignore | ||
.gitreview | ||
.stestr.conf | ||
.zuul.yaml | ||
bindep.txt | ||
LICENSE | ||
README.rst | ||
requirements.txt | ||
setup.cfg | ||
setup.py | ||
tox.ini |
Team and repository tags
OpenStack Vitrage Specifications
This git repository is used to hold approved design specifications for additions to the Vitrage project. Reviews of the specs are done in gerrit, using a similar workflow to how we review and merge changes to the code itself.
The layout of this repository is:
specs/<release>/
Where there are two sub-directories:
specs/<release>/approved: specifications approved but not yet implemented specs/<release>/implemented: implemented specifications
This directory structure allows you to see what we thought about
doing, decided to do, and actually got done. Users interested in
functionality in a given release should only refer to the
implemented
directory.
You can find an example spec in doc/source/specs/template.rst.
Specifications are proposed for a given release by adding them to the specs/<release> directory and posting it for review. The implementation status of a blueprint for a given release can be found by looking at the blueprint in launchpad. Not all approved blueprints will get fully implemented.
Specifications have to be re-proposed for every release. The review may be quick, but even if something was previously approved, it should be re-reviewed to make sure it still makes sense as written.
Launchpad blueprints:
http://blueprints.launchpad.net/vitrage
Starting from the Mitaka-1 development milestone Vitrage performs the pilot of the specs repos approach.
Please note, Launchpad blueprints are still used for tracking the current status of blueprints. For more information, see:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints
For more information about working with gerrit, see:
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow
To validate that the specification is syntactically correct (i.e. get more confidence in the Jenkins result), please execute the following command:
$ tox
After running tox
, the documentation will be available
for viewing in HTML format in the doc/build/
directory.
To build the document automatically on changes, use the command:
$ tox -e autobuild
Then open in a browser http://localhost:8000