2329ccb19d
Change-Id: I7dbfef4fa0b8767cd3be057fceaa356e92d077f7
109 lines
3.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
109 lines
3.2 KiB
ReStructuredText
..
|
|
This template should be in ReSTructured text. The filename in the git
|
|
repository should match the launchpad URL, for example a URL of
|
|
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/awesome-thing should be named
|
|
awesome-thing.rst.
|
|
|
|
Please do not delete any of the sections in this
|
|
template. If you have nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None
|
|
|
|
For help with syntax, see http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/rest.html
|
|
To test out your formatting, see http://www.tele3.cz/jbar/rest/rest.html
|
|
|
|
==================================================
|
|
Design wire protocol for non RESTFul transports
|
|
==================================================
|
|
|
|
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/non-rest-wire-protocol
|
|
|
|
This specs represents the work to be done to design a wire protocol that will
|
|
respect the current API v1.1 and that will also be useful for non-RESTFul
|
|
transmission protocols.
|
|
|
|
Problem description
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
We currently have a well defined protocol that works well for HTTP. As a
|
|
project, we're looking forward to welcome more transports that will work for
|
|
different use-cases but we don't have a way to support them. This blueprint
|
|
aims to define such protocol and the work needed to make it happen.
|
|
|
|
Proposed change
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
Based on the existing protocol defined in this wiki page[0] and the rough spec
|
|
proposed here[1], I'm proposing we use similar to the one below and complete
|
|
the work started by the api-layer blueprint[2].
|
|
|
|
This blueprint, however, does not propose an API layer that should be used by
|
|
*all* transports. Instead, it proposes an API layer that will be used by
|
|
transports relying on lower-level transmission protocols like: websocket, raw
|
|
tcp, etc.
|
|
|
|
Ideally, one would expect Zaqar to support existing protocols like
|
|
STOMP, AMQP, etc. While this may/may not be possible depending on the
|
|
protocol, we should have a protocol that sticks to the service goals
|
|
of being simple, straightforward and lightweight. Other protocols
|
|
could be implemented as separate transports in the future.
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"action": "post_message",
|
|
"header": {
|
|
"User-Agent": "python/2.7 killer-rabbit/1.2",
|
|
"Date": "Wed, 2 8 Nov 2012 21:14:19 GMT",
|
|
"Accept": "application/x-msgpack",
|
|
"Client-ID": 30387f00-39a0-11e2-be4d-a8d15f34bae2,
|
|
"X-Project-ID": 518b51ea133c4facadae42c328d6b77b,
|
|
"X-Auth-Token": "7d2f63fd-4dcc-4752-8e9b-1d08f989cc00"
|
|
},
|
|
"body": {
|
|
...
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zaqar/specs/api/v1.1
|
|
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zaqar/specs/zmq/api/v1
|
|
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/cross-transport-api-spec
|
|
|
|
Alternatives
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
- Don't do anything and let each transport implement it's protocol.
|
|
- Implement a transport on top of a different protocol
|
|
|
|
Implementation
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
Assignee(s)
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Primary assignee:
|
|
flaper87
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milestones
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
Target Milestone for completion:
|
|
Kilo-1
|
|
|
|
Work Items
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
- Define the wire protocol
|
|
- Create an API manager that process messages
|
|
|
|
Dependencies
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
|
|
Unported License.
|
|
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
|
|
|