a4062de4ae
Use library to handle setup of fixtures for testing with git. Change-Id: I5b39f8d52beca848adb20d646c26d91c4b977b92
What is git-upstream?
Git-upstream is an open source Python application that can be used to keep in sync with upstream open source projects. Its goal is to help manage automatically dropping carried patches when syncing with the project upstream, in a manner transparent to local developers.
It was initially developed as a tool for people who are doing active contributions to local mirrors of projects hosted using Gerrit for code review, with the intention that the local changes would be submitted to the upstream Gerrit instance (review.openstack.org for OpenStack) in the future, and would subsequent appear in the upstream mainline.
As it uses git plumbing commands, it can identify identical patches
exactly the same as how git-rebase works, and is not
limited to working with Gerrit hosted projects. It can be used with
projects hosted in GitHub or any other git repo hosting software.
Online documentation:
To install:
pip install git-upstreamSee also https://pypi.org/project/git-upstream
You can also install directly from source:
git clone https://git.openstack.org/openstack/git-upstream.git
cd git-upstream
pip install .Developers
Bug reports:
Repository:
Cloning:
git clone https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/git-upstreamor
git clone https://github.com/openstack/git-upstreamA virtual environment is recommended for development. For example, git-upstream may be installed from the top level directory:
virtualenv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r test-requirements.txt -e .Patches are submitted via Gerrit at:
Please do not submit GitHub pull requests, they will be automatically closed.
More details on how you can contribute is available on our wiki at:
Writing a patch
All code submissions must be pep8 and pyflakes clean. CI will
automatically reject them if they are not. The easiest way to do that is
to run tox before submitting code
for review in Gerrit. It will run pep8 and
pyflakes in the same manner as the automated test suite
that will run on proposed patchsets.
Unit Tests
Unit tests have been included and are in the
git_upstream/tests folder. Many unit tests samples are
included as example scenarios in our documentation to help explain how
git-upstream handles various use cases. To run the unit tests, execute
the command:
tox -e py34,py27- Note: View
tox.inito run tests on other versions of Python, generating the documentation and additionally for any special notes on building one of the scenarios to allow direct inspection and manual execution ofgit-upstreamwith various scenarios.
The unit tests can in many cases be better understood as being closer to functional tests.
Support
The git-upstream community is found on the #git-upstream channel on chat.freenode.net
You can also join via this IRC URL or use the Freenode IRC webchat.
What does git-upstream do?
git-upstream provides new git subcommands to support rebasing of local-carried patches on top of upstream repositories. It provides commands to ease the use of git for who needs to integrate big upstream projects in their environment. The operations are performed using Git commands.
Note
Currently git-upstream works best for projects that are maintained with Gerrit because the presence of Change-Ids allows for fully automated dropping of changes that appear upstream. Nevertheless, the code is quite modular and can be extended to use any part of commit message (e.g., other headers).
Git-upstream currently supports the following features
- Single upstream branch import
Your repository is tracking an upstream project and has local changes applied and no other branch is merged in. This can also be applied to tracking upstream packaging branches: e.g., ubuntu/master => ubuntu/saucy-proposed/nova + local packaging changes.
- Multi branch import (upstream branch + additional branches)
In this case, your project tracks an upstream repository, merges in an arbitrary number of branches and applies local carried changes.
- Re-reviewing
Reviewing (w/ Gerrit) of all locally applied changes if desired. git-upstream creates an import branch in a manner that allows it to be fully re-reviewed or merged into master and pushed.
- Detailed logging
git-upstream can output to both console and log file simultaneously. Multiple log levels are supported, and these are managed separately for log file and console output. This means jobs run by Jenkins can save a detailed log file separately as an artefact while printing status information to the console if those running the jobs don’t wish to have the console spammed with the details.
- Dropping of changes that appear upstream
Compares Change-Id's of changes applied since previous import with those that have appeared on the upstream branch since the last import point.
- Interactive mode
Once the list of changes to be re-applied has been determined (and those to be dropped have been pruned), the tool can open an editor (controlled by a user's git editor settings) for users to review those changes to be made and allow them to perform further operations such as re-ordering, dropping of obsolete changes, and squashing.
- Dropping local changes
It’s always possible for local changes to be superseded by upstream changes, so when these are identified and marked as such, we should drop them.
This can also occur where a change was applied locally, modified when being upstreamed based on review feedback and the resulting differences were ported to the internal as well. While the original change will be automatically dropped, also useful to drop the additional ported changes automatically if possible, rather than have it cause conflicts.
Using git-upstream
Please see workflows
Available commands
Please see subcommands
Authors
git-upstream was initially written by Darragh Bailey dbailey@hpe.com. See AUTHORS file for other contributors.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Aleksander Korzynski and Stanisław Pitucha for taking the original design spec and some basic manual steps and experimenting with initial implementations.
To Davide Guerri, for picking up a rough python tool and turning it into something that was actually usable.
Also to Jon Paul Sullivan and Monty Taylor to listening and providing a sounding board for different approaches.
And finally to Coleman Corrigan among numerous others who acted as willing guinea pigs for the original manual approach.
Hope this eventually helped save you time and some hair.