Files
git-upstream/git_upstream/tests/test_strategies.py
Darragh Bailey e9bf6db057 Additional scenarios that result in missed commits
More complex scenarios showing problems with how searching for previous
commits that should be carried on import miss certain changes.

Change-Id: I830e55933ca87ce41cdd7f474b30ea083d313089
2014-12-15 16:53:42 +00:00

239 lines
7.3 KiB
Python

#
# Copyright (c) 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
# implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
#
from base import BaseTestCase
import_command = __import__("git_upstream.commands.import", globals(),
locals(), ['LocateChangesWalk'], -1)
LocateChangesWalk = import_command.LocateChangesWalk
class TestStrategies(BaseTestCase):
def _verify_expected(self, tree, branches, expected_nodes):
self._build_git_tree(tree, branches.values())
strategy = LocateChangesWalk(branch=branches['head'][0],
search_refs=[branches['upstream'][0]])
self.assertEquals(self._commits_from_nodes(expected_nodes),
[c for c in strategy.filtered_iter()])
def test_locate_changes_walk_basic(self):
"""Construct a basic repo layout and validate that locate changes
walker can find the expected changes.
Repository layout being tested
B master
/
A---C---D upstream/master
"""
tree = [
('A', []),
('B', ['A']),
('C', ['A']),
('D', ['C'])
]
branches = {
'head': ('master', 'B'),
'upstream': ('upstream/master', 'D'),
}
expected_changes = ["B"]
self._verify_expected(tree, branches, expected_changes)
def test_locate_changes_walk_additional_branch(self):
"""Construct a repo layout where previously an additional branch has
been included and validate that locate changes walker can find the
expected changes
Repository layout being tested
B example/packaging
\
C---D---E master
/
A---F---G upstream/master
"""
tree = [
('A', []),
('B', []),
('C', ['A', 'B']),
('D', ['C']),
('E', ['D']),
('F', ['A']),
('G', ['F'])
]
branches = {
'head': ('master', 'E'),
'upstream': ('upstream/master', 'G'),
}
expected_changes = ["D", "E"]
self._verify_expected(tree, branches, expected_changes)
def test_locate_changes_walk_additional_branch_multiple_imports(self):
"""Construct a repo layout where previously an additional branch has
been included and validate that locate changes walker can find the
right changes after an additional import
Repository layout being tested
B-- example/packaging
\ \
C---D---E-------I---J---K master
/ \ /
/ --H---D1--E1 import/next
/ /
A---F---G---L---M upstream/master
"""
tree = [
('A', []),
('B', []),
('C', ['A', 'B']),
('D', ['C']),
('E', ['D']),
('F', ['A']),
('G', ['F']),
('H', ['G', 'B']),
('D1', ['H']),
('E1', ['D1']),
('I', ['E', '=E1']),
('J', ['I']),
('K', ['J']),
('L', ['G']),
('M', ['L'])
]
branches = {
'head': ('master', 'K'),
'upstream': ('upstream/master', 'M'),
}
expected_changes = ["D1", "E1", "J", "K"]
self._verify_expected(tree, branches, expected_changes)
def test_locate_changes_walk_changes_prior_to_import(self):
"""Construct a repo layout where using a complex layout involving
additional branches having been included, and a previous import from
upstream having been completed, test that if a change was created on
another branch before the previous import was created, and merged to
the target branch after the previous import, can we find it correctly.
i.e. will the strategy also include commit 'O' in the diagram below.
Repository layout being tested
B-- example/packaging
\ \
\ \ O----------------
\ \ / \
C---D---E-------I---J---K---P---Q master
/ \ /
/ --H---D1--E1 import/next
/ /
A---F---G---L---M upstream/master
"""
tree = [
('A', []),
('B', []),
('C', ['A', 'B']),
('D', ['C']),
('E', ['D']),
('F', ['A']),
('G', ['F']),
('H', ['G', 'B']),
('D1', ['H']),
('E1', ['D1']),
('I', ['E', '=E1']),
('J', ['I']),
('K', ['J']),
('L', ['G']),
('M', ['L']),
('O', ['E']),
('P', ['K', 'O']),
('Q', ['P'])
]
branches = {
'head': ('master', 'Q'),
'upstream': ('upstream/master', 'M'),
}
expected_changes = ["D1", "E1", "J", "K", "O", "Q"]
self._verify_expected(tree, branches, expected_changes)
def test_locate_changes_walk_changes_approved_after_import_merge(self):
"""Construct a repo layout where using a complex layout involving
additional branches having been included, and a previous import from
upstream having been completed, test that if a change was created on
another branch before the previous import was created, and merged to
the target branch before the previous import was merged, can we find
it correctly.
i.e. will the strategy also include commit 'O' in the diagram below.
Repository layout being tested
O----
/ \
B---C---D---H---I---J---K master
/ \ /
/ ----G
/ /
/ B1--C1--D1 import/next
/ /
A---E---F---L---M upstream/master
"""
tree = [
('A', []),
('B', ['A']),
('C', ['B']),
('D', ['C']),
('E', ['A']),
('F', ['E']),
('B1', ['F']),
('C1', ['B1']),
('D1', ['C1']),
('G', ['D', '=D1']),
('O', ['C']),
('H', ['D', 'O']),
('I', ['H', 'G']),
('J', ['I']),
('K', ['J']),
('L', ['F']),
('M', ['L'])
]
branches = {
'head': ('master', 'K'),
'upstream': ('upstream/master', 'M'),
}
expected_changes = ["B1", "C1", "D1", "O", "J", "K"]
self.expectFailure(
"Should fail to find change 'O'",
self._verify_expected, tree, branches, expected_changes)