Add folder and template for specs

From now on we will be tracking major features using specs proposed
against master. Specs should be proposed with the
``mixmatch-specs`` topic.

Change-Id: Ic42dcf53e161bd09c7c2d8835949eb6447f7fdd0

doc/source/index.rst

@@ -8,15 +8,20 @@ Welcome to mixmatch's documentation!
 
 Contents:
 
-.. toctree::
-   :maxdepth: 2
+..  toctree::
+    :maxdepth: 2
 
-   readme
-   architecture
-   installation
-   identity
-   volumes
-   contributing
+    readme
+    architecture
+    installation
+    identity
+    volumes
+    contributing
+
+..  toctree::
+    :maxdepth: 1
+
+    specs
 
 * `Release Notes <https://mixmatch.readthedocs.org/projects/releasenotes>`_
 

doc/source/specs

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../specs

doc/source/specs.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+=====
+Specs
+=====
+
+Specs for new and approved features in Mixmatch.
+
+Use the template below to propose new features.
+
+.. toctree::
+   :maxdepth: 1
+
+   specs/template
+
+Approved specs
+==============
+
+None
+
+..  Uncomment and reduce indent when something is approved
+    ..  toctree::
+        :glob:
+        :maxdepth: 1
+
+        specs/approved/*
+
+Implemented specs
+=================
+
+None
+
+..  Uncomment and reduce indent when something is implemented.
+    ..  toctree::
+        :glob:
+        :maxdepth: 1
+
+        specs/implemented/*

specs/template.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+..
+ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
+ License.
+
+ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
+
+=====================
+Example Specification
+=====================
+
+`bp example <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mixmatch/+spec/example>`_
+
+
+Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything? A single paragraph of
+prose that operators can understand.
+
+Some notes about using this template:
+
+* Your spec should be in `ReSTructured text
+  <http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html>`_, like this template.
+
+* Wrap text at 79 columns.
+
+* The filename in the git repository should match the launchpad URL, for
+  example a URL of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mixmatch/+spec/new-feature
+  should be named new-feature.rst
+
+* Do not delete any of the sections in this template.  If you have
+  nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None
+
+* To test out your formatting, build the docs using tox, or see:
+  http://rst.ninjs.org
+
+* If you would like to provide a diagram with your spec, ascii diagrams are
+  required.  http://asciiflow.com/ is a very nice tool to assist with making
+  ascii diagrams.  The reason for this is that the tool used to review specs is
+  based purely on plain text.  Plain text will allow review to proceed without
+  having to look at additional files which can not be viewed in gerrit.  It
+  will also allow inline feedback on the diagram itself.
+
+* If your spec has an impact on the HTTP API, propose the corresponding changes
+  to the ``api/`` directory for review along with your spec and add the
+  APIImpact flag to the commit message.
+
+
+Problem Description
+===================
+
+A detailed description of the problem:
+
+* For a new feature, this might be use cases. Ensure you are clear about the
+  actors in each use case: End User vs Deployer
+
+* For a major reworking of part of the code, it would describe the problems in
+  that feature that are being addressed.
+
+This section should clearly communicate *why* it is desirable for the community
+to have a solution to the issue.
+
+Proposed Change
+===============
+
+Here is where you describe the change you propose to make. How do you propose
+to solve this problem? Address the issue at an architectural level, leaving the
+implementation details for code review.
+
+If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In
+other words, what's the scope of this effort?
+
+Alternatives
+------------
+
+What other ways could we do this thing? Why aren't we using those? This doesn't
+have to be a full literature review, but it should demonstrate that thought has
+been put into why the proposed solution is an appropriate one.
+
+Security Impact
+---------------
+
+Describe any potential security impact on the system.  Some of the items to
+consider include:
+
+* Does this change touch sensitive data such as tokens, keys, or user data?
+
+* Does this change alter the API in a way that may impact security, such as
+  a new way to access sensitive information or a new way to login?
+
+* Does this change involve cryptography or hashing?
+
+* Does this change require the use of sudo or any elevated privileges?
+
+* Does this change involve using or parsing user-provided data? This could
+  be directly at the API level or indirectly such as changes to a cache layer.
+
+* Can this change enable a resource exhaustion attack, such as allowing a
+  single API interaction to consume significant server resources? Some examples
+  of this include launching subprocesses for each connection, or entity
+  expansion attacks in XML.
+
+For more detailed guidance, please see the OpenStack Security Guidelines as
+a reference (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Guidelines).  These
+guidelines are a work in progress and are designed to help you identify
+security best practices.  For further information, feel free to reach out
+to the OpenStack Security Group at openstack-security@lists.openstack.org.
+
+Notifications Impact
+--------------------
+
+Please specify any changes to notifications. Be that an extra notification,
+changes to an existing notification, or removing a notification.
+
+Other End User Impact
+---------------------
+
+Aside from the API, are there other ways a user will interact with this
+feature?
+
+Performance Impact
+------------------
+
+Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example
+how often will new code be called, and is there a major change to the calling
+pattern of existing code.
+
+Examples of things to consider here include:
+
+* A small change in a utility function or a commonly used decorator can have a
+  large impacts on performance.
+
+* Calls which result in a database queries can have a profound impact on
+  performance when called in critical sections of the code.
+
+* Will the change include any locking, and if so what considerations are there
+  on holding the lock?
+
+Other Deployer Impact
+---------------------
+
+Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure OpenStack
+that have not already been mentioned, such as:
+
+* What config options are being added? Should they be more generic than
+  proposed (for example a flag that other hypervisor drivers might want to
+  implement as well)? Are the default values ones which will work well in
+  real deployments?
+
+* Is this a change that takes immediate effect after its merged, or is it
+  something that has to be explicitly enabled?
+
+* If this change is a new binary, how would it be deployed?
+
+* Please state anything that those doing continuous deployment, or those
+  upgrading from the previous release, need to be aware of. Also describe
+  any plans to deprecate configuration values or features.  For example, if we
+  change the directory name that instances are stored in, how do we handle
+  instance directories created before the change landed?  Do we move them?  Do
+  we have a special case in the code? Do we assume that the operator will
+  recreate all the instances in their cloud?
+
+Developer Impact
+----------------
+
+Discuss things that will affect other developers working on OpenStack,
+such as:
+
+* If the blueprint proposes a change to the driver API, discussion of how
+  other backends would implement the feature is required.
+
+
+Implementation
+==============
+
+Assignee(s)
+-----------
+
+Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're
+throwing it out there to see who picks it up?
+
+If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the
+primary author and contact.
+
+Primary assignee:
+  <launchpad-id or None>
+
+Other contributors:
+  <launchpad-id or None>
+
+Work Items
+----------
+
+Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be
+done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people,
+but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation.
+
+
+Dependencies
+============
+
+* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in mixmatch, or in
+  other projects, that this one either depends on or is related to.
+
+* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used
+  by mixmatch (such as the glance v2 API when we previously only required v1),
+  document that fact.
+
+* Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not
+  included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library?
+
+
+Documentation Impact
+====================
+
+What is the impact on the docs team of this change? Some changes might require
+donating resources to the docs team to have the documentation updated. Don't
+repeat details discussed above, but please reference them here.
+
+
+References
+==========
+
+Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any
+reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your
+references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are:
+
+* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions
+
+* Links to notes from a summit session
+
+* Links to relevant research, if appropriate
+
+* Related specifications as appropriate (e.g.  if it's an EC2 thing, link the
+  EC2 docs)
+
+* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to