Tom Barron 34e92f9b33 Impove coverage job accuracy
by informing it that we use eventlet for concurrency.

We have many false negative coverage runs, even for changes that
do not touch the code under test, for example in doc only change [1].
According to the coverage documentation, unless we indicate that
we are using an alternate to the thread library for concurrency
we will get "very wrong results." [2]

Set this option correctly.  Also avoid false precision in the
coverage report.

[1] http://logs.openstack.org/01/514901/2/check/openstack-tox-cover/6df6369/

[2] https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/coverage-4.4.1/config.html

TrivialFix

Change-Id: I7398a45cdab8aa4191a55cbb86b9e6499b09f021
(cherry picked from commit c22c073734d26398a3608e23d1ddffd015805342)
2017-11-10 15:44:35 +00:00
2017-08-11 17:22:28 +00:00
2017-11-07 09:02:13 +00:00
2017-03-30 15:12:22 +03:00
2017-11-10 15:44:35 +00:00
2017-01-16 22:24:53 +08:00
2017-08-11 23:00:02 +00:00
2017-11-07 09:02:13 +00:00
2013-08-08 10:34:06 -04:00
2013-08-08 10:34:06 -04:00
2017-08-04 11:23:30 +08:00
2017-03-03 22:51:04 +00:00

Team and repository tags

image

MANILA

You have come across an OpenStack shared file system service. It has identified itself as "Manila." It was abstracted from the Cinder project.

Getting Started

If you'd like to run from the master branch, you can clone the git repo:

git clone https://github.com/openstack/manila.git

For developer information please see HACKING.rst

You can raise bugs here https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila

Python client

https://github.com/openstack/python-manilaclient.git

Description
Shared filesystem management project for OpenStack.
Readme 179 MiB
Languages
Python 99.3%
Shell 0.7%