96 lines
4.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
96 lines
4.0 KiB
ReStructuredText
Reviewing Tempest Code
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
To start read the `OpenStack Common Review Checklist
|
|
<http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review>`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ensuring code is executed
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
For any new or change to a test it has to be verified in the gate. This means
|
|
that the first thing to check with any change is that a gate job actually runs
|
|
it. Tests which aren't executed either because of configuration or skips should
|
|
not be accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit Tests
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
For any change that adds new functionality to either common functionality or an
|
|
out-of-band tool unit tests are required. This is to ensure we don't introduce
|
|
future regressions and to test conditions which we may not hit in the gate runs.
|
|
Tests, and service clients aren't required to have unit tests since they should
|
|
be self verifying by running them in the gate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
API Stability
|
|
-------------
|
|
Tests should only be added for a published stable APIs. If a patch contains
|
|
tests for an API which hasn't been marked as stable or for an API that which
|
|
doesn't conform to the `API stability guidelines
|
|
<https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/APIStability>`_ then it
|
|
should not be approved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reject Copy and Paste Test Code
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
When creating new tests that are similar to existing tests it is tempting to
|
|
simply copy the code and make a few modifications. This increases code size and
|
|
the maintenance burden. Such changes should not be approved if it is easy to
|
|
abstract the duplicated code into a function or method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Being explicit
|
|
--------------
|
|
When tests are being added that depend on a configurable feature or extension,
|
|
polling the API to discover that it is enabled should not be done. This will
|
|
just result in bugs being masked because the test can be skipped automatically.
|
|
Instead the config file should be used to determine whether a test should be
|
|
skipped or not. Do not approve changes that depend on an API call to determine
|
|
whether to skip or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Configuration Options
|
|
---------------------
|
|
With the introduction of the tempest external test plugin interface we needed
|
|
to provide a stable contract for tempest's configuration options. This means
|
|
we can no longer simply remove a configuration option when it's no longer used.
|
|
Patches proposed that remove options without a deprecation cycle should not
|
|
be approved. Similarly when changing default values with configuration we need
|
|
to similarly be careful that we don't break existing functionality. Also, when
|
|
adding options, just as before, we need to weigh the benefit of adding an
|
|
additional option against the complexity and maintenance overhead having it
|
|
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Documentation
|
|
------------------
|
|
When a new test is being added refer to the :ref:`TestDocumentation` section in
|
|
hacking to see if the requirements are being met. With the exception of a class
|
|
level docstring linking to the API ref doc in the API tests and a docstring for
|
|
scenario tests this is up to the reviewers discretion whether a docstring is
|
|
required or not.
|
|
|
|
Release Notes
|
|
-------------
|
|
Release notes are how we indicate to users and other consumers of Tempest what
|
|
has changed in a given release. Since Tempest 10.0.0 we've been using `reno`_
|
|
to manage and build the release notes. There are certain types of changes that
|
|
require release notes and we should not approve them without including a release
|
|
note. These include but aren't limited to, any addition, deprecation or removal
|
|
from the lib interface, any change to configuration options (including
|
|
deprecation), CLI additions or deprecations, major feature additions, and
|
|
anything backwards incompatible or would require a user to take note or do
|
|
something extra.
|
|
|
|
.. _reno: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/
|
|
|
|
When to approve
|
|
---------------
|
|
* Every patch needs two +2s before being approved.
|
|
* Its ok to hold off on an approval until a subject matter expert reviews it
|
|
* If a patch has already been approved but requires a trivial rebase to merge,
|
|
you do not have to wait for a second +2, since the patch has already had
|
|
two +2s.
|